The constitutionality of committal to civil jail in Kenya.

dc.contributor.authorWAFULA, MARVIN
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T09:56:47Z
dc.date.available2021-12-20T09:56:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.descriptionThe chapter offers a succinct background to the problem. It comprises of a brief account of the study problem, a rationalization for the study as well as the purposes of the study. It also captures the hypothesis and literature review. Moreover, the chapter provides a theoretical framework of study, a window through which the literature on the study will be evaluated. The chapter lastly examines the research strategy and approach providing a manual in the manner of the research.en_US
dc.description.abstractA conflict between local and international instruments usually brings confusion and dissimilarity, especially in judgements delivered by courts. Article 11 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides that no one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation. This is an instrument ratified by Kenya and is part of Kenyan laws by virtue of Article 2 (6) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. On the other hand Section 38 of the Civil Procedure Act gives arrest and detention in prison as a method of executing a judgment where the judgment-debtor does not pay up.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11071/12395
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherStrathmore Universityen_US
dc.titleThe constitutionality of committal to civil jail in Kenya.en_US
dc.typeLearning Objecten_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The constitutionality of committal to civil jail in Kenya..docx
Size:
89.69 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: