The justiciability of the right to development in Ghana : mirage or possibility?
| dc.contributor.author | Kwame, Asare Larbi Paa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-25T09:54:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-25T09:54:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-01 | |
| dc.description | Article | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | An analysis of the debate on the right to development (RTD) suggests that the right is pursued as a solution to solve the problems of poverty and underdevelopment. Thus, this study seeks to determine if at the national level in Ghana, the right to development is a right which is opposable by right-holders against the duty bearers. The Study adopted the Black Letter Law approach in analysing the legal effect of relevant law. This study shows that the African Charter is the only multinational treaty that makes RTD legally enforceable. It also shows that Ghana, which is dualist, has not ratified the African Charter. It is however argued that the Ghanaian courts may enforce RTD either as international law or as a human right implicitly guaranteed under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana. This conclusion supports the notion that development is a human rights concern. It further illustrates that the national courts of African countries are uniquely equipped to guarantee the protection of human rights and the development of the African people. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11071/4669 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Strathmore University Press | en_US |
| dc.subject | Right to development | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ghana | en_US |
| dc.subject | Justice | en_US |
| dc.subject | Law | en_US |
| dc.subject | Africa | en_US |
| dc.title | The justiciability of the right to development in Ghana : mirage or possibility? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |