Implementation remains the achilles heel of the African Union: a study of the African Peer-Review Mechanism (APRM)

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJaoko, Imani
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-25T09:31:07Z
dc.date.available2016-07-25T09:31:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe potential power of Africa is undisputed. The continent is home to a large, young population and is a potential economic powerhouse in the world. In order to realise its full potential, the African Union (AU) must guide the continent. The AU, has however, repeatedly faltered in this regard. The implementation mechanisms of the AU seem to be its Achilles’ heel. The AU suffers no shortage of well-formulated policies; instead it suffers from a chronic inability to follow up on these policies. This paper maps the formation of the AU, the promise it held and the factors that limit the ability of the AU to implement its programs and policies. The paper then briefly examines the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) looking at the problems of implementation it has faced and how these may be remedied.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11071/4665
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherStrathmore University Pressen_US
dc.subjectAfrican Peer-Review Mechanismen_US
dc.subjectAPRMen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectAfrican Unionen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleImplementation remains the achilles heel of the African Union: a study of the African Peer-Review Mechanism (APRM)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Collections
SLR - Volume 1, Number 1, January 2016