Gikuyu Ethnophilosophy from the perspective of Leonardo Polo’s transcendental anthropology
| dc.creator | Njuguna, Caroline | |
| dc.date | 07/25/2014 | |
| dc.date | Fri, 25 Jul 2014 | |
| dc.date | Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:56:07 | |
| dc.date | Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:56:07 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-18T11:29:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-18T11:29:13Z | |
| dc.description | Conference paper | |
| dc.description | The purpose of this paper is to see how the Transcendental Anthropology of Leonardo Polo can shed light on the ethnophilosophy of the Gikuyu people. I will highlight the similarity between the view of the human person according to L. Polo’s triadic structure of the human person and that of one of the conceptions of African philosophy called ethnophilosophy, based on Gikuyu proverbs using the work of Dr. G. Wanjohi: The Wisdom and Philosophy of the Gikuyu Proverbs. According to L. Polo’s Transcendental Anthropology the human person is composed of a triadic structure with the lowest level being the natural level. This is the level where we find man’s passions and desires what man has in common with animals. It is also the level of the external and internal senses. The next level is the essential level; this is the level where man is distinguished from animals because we find here intellect and will both of which are spiritual capacities. At the highest level we have the personal level which is composed of the 4 radicals: personal co-existence, personal love, personal knowledge and personal freedom. Academic African Philosophy is relatively recent especially in comparison to Western Philosophy yet it has already been classified into a number of different conceptions, the four main conceptions being ethnophilosophy; philosophic sagacity; nationalist-ideological philosophy and; professional philosophy (Oruka 1981, pp 1-7). Ochieng-Odhiambo says that ethnnophilosophy is called thus because it uses a method that resembles that which is ordinarily used in cultural anthropology (ethnology) to get the basic underlying principles of the reality and behavior of the African and then describes it in philosophical language (Ochieng-Odiambo 2009, pp 73). Dr. Wanjohi adds that ‘… (it) is a philosophy which, in a non-literary society, expresses a people’s world-view and culture…’ (Wanjohi 1997, pp 76) Dr. Wanjohi claims that the Gikuyu proverbs demonstrate philosophy in two ways: Firstly, that they are reflective and critical which are characteristics of philosophy in the second order sense as opposed to philosophy in the first order sense which is considered to be more descriptive and relative. Secondly, that the proverbs refer to both basic and applied philosophy. In the Gikuyu proverbs one can discover a distinction similar to that found in the triadic structure where at the highest level the proverbs refer to a level similar to the personal level with great importance given to the good relation to God who is known as Ngai and with man in relation to others. Further there is a clear distinction given to the level of the intellect and will which is lower than the level of relation to Ngai but higher than the level of passions and desires which we can compare to the natural level as defined in Transcendental Anthropology. | |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this paper is to see how the Transcendental Anthropology of Leonardo Polo can shed light on the ethnophilosophy of the Gikuyu people. I will highlight the similarity between the view of the human person according to L. Polo’s triadic structure of the human person and that of one of the conceptions of African philosophy called ethnophilosophy, based on Gikuyu proverbs using the work of Dr. G. Wanjohi: The Wisdom and Philosophy of the Gikuyu Proverbs. According to L. Polo’s Transcendental Anthropology the human person is composed of a triadic structure with the lowest level being the natural level. This is the level where we find man’s passions and desires what man has in common with animals. It is also the level of the external and internal senses. The next level is the essential level; this is the level where man is distinguished from animals because we find here intellect and will both of which are spiritual capacities. At the highest level we have the personal level which is composed of the 4 radicals: personal co-existence, personal love, personal knowledge and personal freedom. Academic African Philosophy is relatively recent especially in comparison to Western Philosophy yet it has already been classified into a number of different conceptions, the four main conceptions being ethnophilosophy; philosophic sagacity; nationalist-ideological philosophy and; professional philosophy (Oruka 1981, pp 1-7). Ochieng-Odhiambo says that ethnnophilosophy is called thus because it uses a method that resembles that which is ordinarily used in cultural anthropology (ethnology) to get the basic underlying principles of the reality and behavior of the African and then describes it in philosophical language (Ochieng-Odiambo 2009, pp 73). Dr. Wanjohi adds that ‘… (it) is a philosophy which, in a non-literary society, expresses a people’s world-view and culture…’ (Wanjohi 1997, pp 76) Dr. Wanjohi claims that the Gikuyu proverbs demonstrate philosophy in two ways: Firstly, that they are reflective and critical which are characteristics of philosophy in the second order sense as opposed to philosophy in the first order sense which is considered to be more descriptive and relative. Secondly, that the proverbs refer to both basic and applied philosophy. In the Gikuyu proverbs one can discover a distinction similar to that found in the triadic structure where at the highest level the proverbs refer to a level similar to the personal level with great importance given to the good relation to God who is known as Ngai and with man in relation to others. Further there is a clear distinction given to the level of the intellect and will which is lower than the level of relation to Ngai but higher than the level of passions and desires which we can compare to the natural level as defined in Transcendental Anthropology. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11071/3794 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.rights | By agreeing with and accepting this license, I (the author(s), copyright owner or nominated agent) agree to the conditions, as stated below, for deposit of the item (referred to as .the Work.) in the digital repository maintained by Strathmore University, or any other repository authorized for use by Strathmore University. Non-exclusive Rights Rights granted to the digital repository through this agreement are entirely non-exclusive. I understand that depositing the Work in the repository does not affect my rights to publish the Work elsewhere, either in present or future versions. I agree that Strathmore University may electronically store, copy or translate the Work to any approved medium or format for the purpose of future preservation and accessibility. Strathmore University is not under any obligation to reproduce or display the Work in the same formats or resolutions in which it was originally deposited. SU Digital Repository I understand that work deposited in the digital repository will be accessible to a wide variety of people and institutions, including automated agents and search engines via the World Wide Web. I understand that once the Work is deposited, metadata may be incorporated into public access catalogues. I agree as follows: 1.That I am the author or have the authority of the author/s to make this agreement and do hereby give Strathmore University the right to make the Work available in the way described above. 2.That I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the Work is original, and to the best of my knowledge, does not breach any laws including those relating to defamation, libel and copyright. 3.That I have, in instances where the intellectual property of other authors or copyright holders is included in the Work, gained explicit permission for the inclusion of that material in the Work, and in the electronic form of the Work as accessed through the open access digital repository, or that I have identified that material for which adequate permission has not been obtained and which will be inaccessible via the digital repository. 4.That Strathmore University does not hold any obligation to take legal action on behalf of the Depositor, or other rights holders, in the event of a breach of intellectual property rights, or any other right, in the material deposited. 5.That if, as a result of my having knowingly or recklessly given a false statement at points 1, 2 or 3 above, the University suffers loss, I will make good that loss and indemnify Strathmore University for all action, suits, proceedings, claims, demands and costs occasioned by the University in consequence of my false statement. | |
| dc.subject | Gikuyu | |
| dc.subject | philosophy | |
| dc.subject | Leonardo Polo | |
| dc.subject | Transcendental Anthropology | |
| dc.title | Gikuyu Ethnophilosophy from the perspective of Leonardo Polo’s transcendental anthropology | |
| dc.type | Conference Paper |