The Moral acceptability of genetically modified foods (gmo’s)
| dc.creator | Gichuru, Virginia Gathoni | |
| dc.date | 01/25/2013 | |
| dc.date | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 | |
| dc.date | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:39:49 | |
| dc.date | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:39:49 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-18T11:28:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-18T11:28:49Z | |
| dc.description | 9TH Annual ethics conference. Theme : Bioethics medical, legal, environmental and cultural aspects in healthcare ethics at STRATHMORE UNIVERSITY, 25-26 OCTOBER 2012. | |
| dc.description | There is belief that the use of biotechnologies in combination with conventional plant breeding, can contribute to the food security of Africa. Some of these potential benefits of genetically modified biotech crops include tolerance to salinity, resistance to pests, and enhanced nutritional value. Nutritionally enhanced crops are important in developing countries to fight malnutrition and its related diseases. On the other hand the advent of biotech crops has been met with skepticism by different sectors of the public. People want to know whether these crops are safe, cheaper and more nutritious. However, informed decisions about their use have been left to individual countries. In Kenya, Genetically modified maize has been imported into the country to meet the current shortfall in the maize crop. This has been met with public outcry. The purpose of this study was to examine the moral acceptability of genetically modified foods using the Aristotelian understanding of Ethics. This is method looks at the elements involved in any free human act and analyses the object, intention and circumstances surrounding such an act. In the case of genetic modification this is to ascertain whether such an action enhance the nature of man and his common good. The approach used was to make use of secondary data source in order to understand the ethicalness of modifying GM foods based on Aristotelian Ethics Results were analysed based on different scenarios labeled A-H. The moral object analysed in all the scenarios were the GM foods inserted with genes from plants,animals,bacteria or viruses so as to confer advantages to the modified crops such as drought, disease and pest resistance. The intentions were varied. For instance the intention of scientists would be to engineer food crops so as to acquire food security. This can be a morally good action since it enhances the human dignity. The circumstances surrounding such an action could be that some of these genes might be harmful to human beings and the environment because most times these genes are coming from non plants. The moral value of such an action is bad because it will affect human health negatively and hence go against the human nature. The implications of this study indicate that the human aspect in Gm foods must be taken into consideration because it is the human person who adds to any aspect the ethical or moral dimension. Also Universities like Strathmore University, which has a strong background in Ethics should team up with other research institutes engaged in the production of GM products and ensure that these products are not only economically and technologically sound but also morally sound. | |
| dc.description.abstract | There is belief that the use of biotechnologies in combination with conventional plant breeding, can contribute to the food security of Africa. Some of these potential benefits of genetically modified biotech crops include tolerance to salinity, resistance to pests, and enhanced nutritional value. Nutritionally enhanced crops are important in developing countries to fight malnutrition and its related diseases. On the other hand the advent of biotech crops has been met with skepticism by different sectors of the public. People want to know whether these crops are safe, cheaper and more nutritious. However, informed decisions about their use have been left to individual countries. In Kenya, Genetically modified maize has been imported into the country to meet the current shortfall in the maize crop. This has been met with public outcry. The purpose of this study was to examine the moral acceptability of genetically modified foods using the Aristotelian understanding of Ethics. This is method looks at the elements involved in any free human act and analyses the object, intention and circumstances surrounding such an act. In the case of genetic modification this is to ascertain whether such an action enhance the nature of man and his common good. The approach used was to make use of secondary data source in order to understand the ethicalness of modifying GM foods based on Aristotelian Ethics Results were analysed based on different scenarios labeled A-H. The moral object analysed in all the scenarios were the GM foods inserted with genes from plants,animals,bacteria or viruses so as to confer advantages to the modified crops such as drought, disease and pest resistance. The intentions were varied. For instance the intention of scientists would be to engineer food crops so as to acquire food security. This can be a morally good action since it enhances the human dignity. The circumstances surrounding such an action could be that some of these genes might be harmful to human beings and the environment because most times these genes are coming from non plants. The moral value of such an action is bad because it will affect human health negatively and hence go against the human nature. The implications of this study indicate that the human aspect in Gm foods must be taken into consideration because it is the human person who adds to any aspect the ethical or moral dimension. Also Universities like Strathmore University, which has a strong background in Ethics should team up with other research institutes engaged in the production of GM products and ensure that these products are not only economically and technologically sound but also morally sound. | |
| dc.format | Number of Pages:26 p. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11071/3428 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.rights | By agreeing with and accepting this license, I (the author(s), copyright owner or nominated agent) agree to the conditions, as stated below, for deposit of the item (referred to as .the Work.) in the digital repository maintained by Strathmore University, or any other repository authorized for use by Strathmore University. Non-exclusive Rights Rights granted to the digital repository through this agreement are entirely non-exclusive. I understand that depositing the Work in the repository does not affect my rights to publish the Work elsewhere, either in present or future versions. I agree that Strathmore University may electronically store, copy or translate the Work to any approved medium or format for the purpose of future preservation and accessibility. Strathmore University is not under any obligation to reproduce or display the Work in the same formats or resolutions in which it was originally deposited. SU Digital Repository I understand that work deposited in the digital repository will be accessible to a wide variety of people and institutions, including automated agents and search engines via the World Wide Web. I understand that once the Work is deposited, metadata may be incorporated into public access catalogues. I agree as follows: 1.That I am the author or have the authority of the author/s to make this agreement and do hereby give Strathmore University the right to make the Work available in the way described above. 2.That I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the Work is original, and to the best of my knowledge, does not breach any laws including those relating to defamation, libel and copyright. 3.That I have, in instances where the intellectual property of other authors or copyright holders is included in the Work, gained explicit permission for the inclusion of that material in the Work, and in the electronic form of the Work as accessed through the open access digital repository, or that I have identified that material for which adequate permission has not been obtained and which will be inaccessible via the digital repository. 4.That Strathmore University does not hold any obligation to take legal action on behalf of the Depositor, or other rights holders, in the event of a breach of intellectual property rights, or any other right, in the material deposited. 5.That if, as a result of my having knowingly or recklessly given a false statement at points 1, 2 or 3 above, the University suffers loss, I will make good that loss and indemnify Strathmore University for all action, suits, proceedings, claims, demands and costs occasioned by the University in consequence of my false statement. | |
| dc.subject | Genetically modified foods | |
| dc.subject | ethics | |
| dc.subject | Aristotelian | |
| dc.subject | object | |
| dc.subject | intention | |
| dc.subject | circumstances. | |
| dc.title | The Moral acceptability of genetically modified foods (gmo’s) | |
| dc.type | Conference Paper |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- The Moral acceptability of genetically modified foods (gmo’s).pdf
- Size:
- 355.14 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: