• Login
    View Item 
    •   SU+ Home
    • Research and Publications
    • Strathmore University Academia+
    • SU Scholarly Articles
    • View Item
    •   SU+ Home
    • Research and Publications
    • Strathmore University Academia+
    • SU Scholarly Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Rethinking university education in Kenya: the case study for USD in Higher Education

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Rethinking university education in Kenya- the case study for USD in Higher Education.pdf (67.43Kb)
    Author
    David Olof Kronlid
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Business Education and indeed, education generally is changing in terms of teaching, research and learning, thus moving from narrow to wider, more holistic education. Today a dynamic international academia allows a mixing of different knowledge cultures necessary to address business and sustainability questions in society. This paper therefore explores the rise of cross-disciplinary higher education in Kenya and the implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) under the UNEP’s MESA programme. It asserts that learning for sustainable development is a joint search by universities, lecturers and their students for knowledge and competencies that enable them to deal with dilemmas in complex social settings. It submits that, that type of learning asks for authentic and open learning environments in which encounters with a diversity of disciplinary and stakeholder perspectives can take place. Thus, the paper suggests that cross-disciplinary theory with its cross-disciplinary “knowledge, research, or education as its main objects of study” (Nissani 2004:2) may contribute to a deeper understanding of pluralistic ESD. Accordingly, the paper discusses four cross-disciplinary educational strategies; mono-, multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary education. The paper notes that at the moment, unfortunately, education policy in Kenya is not clearly defined and does not optimally support this holistic learning. The paper concludes that learning for sustainable development constitutes a trigger for innovations in education and should therefore be supported.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11071/3302
    Collections
    • SU Scholarly Articles [88]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of SU+Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV